State v. Hillis

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

In this case the defendant was charged with petty larceny in five counts differing only as to dates, and the trial court sustained a motion to quash the information and all the counts thereof because they failed to charge any offense against the laws of the state, and particularly because no criminal intent was alleged, and the state, under the provisions of G. S. 1935, 62-1703, appealed from that ruling.

*457The first count of the information is as follows:

“That on the 11th day of March, 1935, in the county of Lyon, state of Kansas, one Arwin…