Legal Opinion

State v. Buis

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 8, 1910No. 17,056PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from Elk district court.

1Per curiam

The defendant was arrested upon an information charging him with a violation of sections 8090 and 8091 of the General Statutes of 1909. -The information was quashed by the district court on the motion of the defendant. The state appeals.

Section 8091, so far as it concerns the present case, reads as follows:

“Any person who shall practice medicine and surgery or osteopathy in the state of Kansas without having received and had recorded a certificate under the provisions of this act . . . shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor.” (Laws 1901, ch. 254, § 7.)

Section 8090, so far as it concerns the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  2. City of Kansas v. GarnierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. State v. SeelySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. State v. ThurmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. State v. BellamySupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Levell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  2. Manhattan Oil Co. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  3. State v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946
  4. State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  5. Patrick v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API