Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Calliham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 2, 1936No. 5184PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

Plaintiff instituted this suit, which was a petitory action; and in the alternative prayed that, in the event the court should find his action, based upon his alleged title, not good, it fix the boundary line between his property and that of defendant.

Defendant filed a plea of res judicata, based upon a judgment rendered in a former suit between the same parties, involving the same land, in which case the demands of plaintiff were rejected and no appeal perfected from said judgment.

■The lower court sustained the plea of res judicata and ordered plaintiff’s suit dismissed, at his…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hanchey v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  2. Hotard v. DupontLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. State ex rel. Hodge v. OliverSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mossler Acceptance Co. v. MoliereLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Morgan v. CallihamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API