Legal Opinion

Mossler Acceptance Co. v. Moliere

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1938No. 16968PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCALEB, Judge.

This matter has been submitted to us on a motion to dismiss the appeal. The pertinent facts applicable to a proper consideration of the motion are as follows:

On March 7, 1938, the plaintiff-appellant instituted executory proceedings against one Roy Moliere seeking to foreclose on a chattel mortgage held by it upon an automobile owned by him. The writ of seizure was duly issued in accordance with law and the car was advertised for sale by the Constable of the First City Court.

On March 21, 1938, Oliver Meyer, the appellee, intervened in the proceedings, claiming ownership of the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Orleans & J. Ry. Co. v. International Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  2. James v. St. Charles Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  3. River & Rails Terminals, Inc. v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Consolidated Ass'n of the Planters v. MasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1872
  5. State v. BalizeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wells v. McGeheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Nomey v. State, Department of HighwaysLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Cox v. GrossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Forman v. MayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Kemper v. DoyalLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API