United States v. Vincent Ezeiruaku
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
The question for decision in this appeal by the United States is whether the fourth amendment “border search” exception to the requirement of probable cause, reasonable suspicion or a warrant applies to outgoing as well as to incoming border searches of luggage. The district court determined that there was no justification for applying the border search exception to outgoing searches. We disagree, and for the reasons that follow, will reverse.
I
Jurisdiction was proper in the trial court based on 18 U.S.C. § 3231. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. James S. Hill, Jr., James HillCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Patrick CogginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Daniel OriakhiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.