Legal Opinion

Ninth Street Community Paving Project Committee v. City of Ironton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1986No. 84-1560PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The first issue presented for our consideration is whether the appellees substantially complied with the notice provisions set forth in R.C. Chapter 727 in a manner satisfying due process, as a matter of equity. The appellees contend that they substantially complied with these requirements in notifying affected property owners of potential assessments arising out of the street projects. The appellant property owners counter that the record is replete with examples of either sloppily attempted notification or simply no notification at all, and that such amounts to a denial of due process.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bissell v. CouchaineOhio Supreme Court · 1846
  2. Butler v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Stockdale Borough v. AstleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Boellner v. City of MaumeeOhio Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BarberOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  2. Williams v. Schneider, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  3. Abram v. City of Avon LakeOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Williams v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API