Camden County Energy Recovery Associates, L.P. v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Wefing’s thoughtful and persuasive opinion. In affirming, we are mindful of information provided at oral argument that, because of legislative appropriations, none of the bonds issued by the Pollution Control Financing Authority of Camden County is in default and that the Legislature is continuing to pursue a comprehensive solution to the statewide problem characterized by this litigation.
Notwithstanding Camden County’s contention before us that its claim for declaratory judgment relief against…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Banco Popular North America v. GandiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Rezem Family Associates, LP v. Borough of MillstoneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Hoffman v. Hampshire Labs, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- Edwards v. Prudential Prop. & Cas.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
- State of New Jersey, by the Commissioner of Transportation v. Cherry Hill Mitsubishi, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.