Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Hampshire Labs, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 30, 2009No. A-3401-07T1PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

963 A.2d 849 (2009)

405 N.J. Super. 105

Harold M. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

HAMPSHIRE LABS, INC. and Video Age, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.

No. A-3401-07T1

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 18, 2008.

Decided January 30, 2009.

Harold M. Hoffman, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Scott Shaffer, New York City, argued the cause for respondents (The Lustigman Firm, P.C., attorneys; Mr. Shaffer, of counsel; Andrew B. Lustigman and Jill L. Abitbol, on the brief).

Before Judges PARKER, YANNOTTI and LeWINN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

YANNOTTI, J.A.D.

Plaintif…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
  3. Jewish Center of Sussex Cty. v. WhaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Thiedemann v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  5. Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Paul and Barbara Miller v. Bank of America Home Loan Servicing, L.P.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  2. Hoffman v. SUPPLEMENTS TOGO MGT.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  3. Clair W. Flinn v. Amboy National Bank and Ab Monmouth, LLCNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
  4. Liberty Mut. v. Garden State Surg.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  5. Cameron v. S. Jersey Pubs, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2019

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API