Young v. Moore
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by Sylvester A. Young against Henry H.. Moore and others upon certain promissory notes. An order overruling a demurrer is reviewed by defendants on. writ of certiorari. Plaintiff brought suit against defendants, as directors of the Tabard Office Supply Company, a foreign corporation, by which he sought to recover from them the amount of two promissory notes made by said corporation.
Read the full summary
Certiorari to Mecosta; Palmer, J. Assumpsit by Sylvester A. Young against Henry H.. Moore and others upon certain promissory notes. An order overruling a demurrer is reviewed by defendants on. writ of certiorari. Plaintiff brought suit against defendants, as directors of the Tabard Office Supply Company, a foreign corporation, by which he sought to recover from them the amount of two promissory notes made by said corporation. The defendants, as such directors, had failed to make the annual report for the year 1907. The action is brought under the provisions of Act No. 232 of the Public Acts…
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
(after stating the facts). The Tabard ■Office Supply Company was admitted to do business in this State on December 15, 1906, under the provisions of Act .No. 206 of the Public Acts of 1901. Section 5 of that act is as follows:
“Any foreign corporation so admitted to carry on business in this State shall be subject to any and all provisions of statute requiring the filing of reports by corporations of this State, organized for the purpose for which such foreign corporation shall have been admitted; and a failure to file such report within the time prescribed shall be sufficient cause for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miller v. . QuincyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- Park Bank v. RemsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Shaw v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Gilbert v. KennedyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Crosby v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- People v. GansleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1916