Legal Opinion
United States v. Larry L. Masino
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided September 7, 2017No. 16-15451; 16-15609PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether an indictment that alleges that a business was in violation of the Florida bingo and gambling house statutes, Fla. Stat. §§ 849,01, 849.02, 849.03, 849.0931, sufficiently alleges one of the essential elements needed to obtain a conviction under the federal gambling statute: that the business “is a violation of’ state law, 18 U.S.C. § 1955(b)(1)(i). Larry Masino and his ex-wife Dixie Masino own a Florida business called Racetrack Bingo Inc. Although Florida law generally prohibits gambling, it allows bingo to be conducted under stringent…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hartley Ex Rel. Hartley v. ParnellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Summit Medical Associates, P.C. v. PryorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Omar Paez v. Claudia MulveyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Amber Jackson v. Cody SwangerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Patricia Lee v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Amber Jackson v. Cody SwangerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Omar Paez v. Claudia MulveyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.