Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Coeur D'Alenes Lead Co. v. Kingsbury

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1936No. 6218Published

1Concurrence

AILSHIE, J.,

Specially Concurring. — I was not present on the oral argument of this case but since the sitting Justices are not able to agree upon the grounds on which the case should be decided, the record and briefs have been referred to me by the Chief Justice with the request that I examine the matter and express my views thereon.

Primarily and fundamentally the appeal taken in Wayne v. Marquardt, 54 Ida. 211, 30 Pac. (2d) 369, in which the supersedeas bond was given, was not taken from any affirmative order or judgment. It was simply taken from a negative order. The appellants had moved…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Richardson v. RuddyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Taylor v. HulettIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Newlands v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Baldwin v. AndersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API