Legal Opinion
Dardaganis v. Grace Capital, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 30, 1987No. 86 Civ. 6135 (RWS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The plaintiffs Trustees of the Retirement Fund of the Fur Manufacturing Industry (the “Fund”) have moved pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for summary judgment in their favor with respect to Count II of the complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
FACTS
The following facts are not in dispute, except as noted. The Fund, a multiemployer pension plan with offices in New York City, provides pension benefits to approximately 5,000 current or former employees in the fur garment industry and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Freund v. Marshall & Ilsley BankDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1979
- Donovan v. BierwirthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Beacon Associates LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Dardaganis v. Grace Capital Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Whitfield v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Dardaganis v. Grace Capital Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.