United States v. Lawrence Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDITH BROWN CLEMENT, Circuit Judge:
We are tasked with deciding whether Lawrence James Taylor’s claim that his sentence enhancement is no longer valid under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”) is constitutionally or statutorily based in light of the district court’s conclusion that the now constitutionally defunct residual clause “played no role” at his sentencing. We hold that Taylor’s claim is constitutionally based and warrants relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
Facts and Proceedings
In 2006, Lawrence James Taylor pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon—which usually…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Ronald PeppersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Antonyo ReeceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Pamela Golinveaux v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Dimott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Glen ClayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.