Legal Opinion
United States v. Alphonso Vonn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2002No. 98-50385PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We previously set aside Vonn’s guilty plea because the district court did not advise Vonn of his right to be represented by counsel at trial. United States v. Vonn, 224 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir.2000). In so doing, we followed our circuit precedent of reviewing the district court’s violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 for harmless error even when the defendant failed to object, id. at 1155 (citing United States v. Odedo, 154 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir.1998)), and confining our review to the record of the defendant’s plea proceeding, id. (citing Odedo, 154 F.3d at 940, and United States v. Gastelum, 16…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver ODEDO, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Alphonso VonnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Victoriano Dejesus PenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Frank Jimenez-Dominguez, A.K.A. Ramon Santos, A.K.A. Frank Martin Jimenez, A.K.A. Frank Jimenez, A.K.A. Frank Dominquez JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Rivera-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Carlos Dominguez Benitez AKA Carlos DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.