Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Chase v. Minnesota Tax Commission

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 22, 1916No. Nos. 20,040—(15)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Hpon the relation of W. S. Chase, the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari to review the action of the Minnesota Tax Commission in the matter of the application of relator for a reduction of the assessed valuation of real estate belonging to relator.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Certiorari to review the order and decision of the State Tax Commission classifying certain real property for the purpose of taxation.

The facts are short and as follows: Belator owns what formerly was a part of Jackson, Daniels & Whitney’s'platted addition to the city of Minneapolis, namely, a part of lot 6, and all of lots 7 and 8 in block 18 of that plat. The addition was duly laid out, and the plat filed in the office of the register of deeds of Hennepin county, in December, 1856; but all that part thereof which included this and some adjoining lots was vacated by decree of the court in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clementson v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. National Bank of Republic of New York v. BanholzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. In re Smith's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. State v. SmallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Apartment Operators Assn. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. In re Proceedings to Enforce Payment of Taxes on Real EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Bird v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Dietz v. Becker (In Re Becker)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. Staples v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API