Legal Opinion

Tuggle v. Tribble

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 21, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). No motion for a new trial was filed in the circuit court, and, under our rules of practice, we can only consider errors appearing on the face of the record. Burns v. Harrington, 162 Ark. 162, 257 S. W. 720; and Miller v. Tatum, 170 Ark. 152, 279 S. W. 1002. Counsel for appellants recognize this rule, but rely for reversal of the judgment on certain errors which they claim appear on the face of the record.

The method of procedure adopted by A. H. Tribble and other property owners in petitioning for the alteration of the public road was in accordance with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Davis v. GainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. Booe v. Road Improvement District No. 4Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Miller v. TatumSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
  4. Burns v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  5. Hill v. McClintockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ark. State Highway Comm. v. BinghamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  2. Risser v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  3. Hardin v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Greer v. City of TexarkanaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  5. Oil Fields Corp. v. CubageSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API