Estate of St. John
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
The sole question presented upon this appeal is whether the court below erred in issuing letters of administration to the public administrator to the exclusion of the nominee of the children of the decedent. Respondent public administrator contends that it was proper for the probate court, in the exercise of its discretion, to prefer him because of the adverse interest of the children growing out of their claim, evidenced by an action pending at the time of the appointment, that all of the property of the estate represented the separate property of decedent’s first wife and passed to them as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brundage v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- In re Estate of CarmodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Randall v. PhilbrookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- Partridge v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Estate of DeBrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Berry v. WakefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Matter of Estate of LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Williams v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.