Legal Opinion

Manna v. United States Department of Justice

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 15, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-2772PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff pro se Louis Anthony Manna (“Manna”) commenced this action against defendants United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”) 1 pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”) to obtain certain records in the possession of the DEA. Specifically, plaintiff seeks any records “in reference to the plaintiff or any records making reference to the plaintiff.” Compl. at ¶ 1.

Before me now are the following motions: 1) Manna’s motion to “reopen the case”; 2) defendants’ motion for…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Department of the Air Force v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Miller v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Alexander v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  3. Anderson v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Singh v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Berger v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API