Legal Opinion
City of Portland v. Sunseri
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 21, 1983No. DA 236332-8206AP; CA A27809PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The city appeals the dismissal of a complaint charging defendant with unlawful employment of a minor in violation of Portland City Ordinance No. 130672, Section 14.28.050. The trial court dismissed the complaint on the ground that the ordinance is preempted by ORS 167.830, 167.840 and “OLCC regulation.” We reverse and remand.
Section 14.28.050 provided:
“It is unlawful for any person to employ a person under 21 years of age to perform as an entertainer, other than a musician, in a room or enclosure where alcoholic liquor is offered for sale to the public by the individual drink.”
ORS 167.830…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Landreth v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of TroutdaleOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Terry v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ashland Drilling, Inc. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Isom v. Portland General Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Denton Plastics, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Sekne v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- City of Corvallis v. Pi Kappa PhiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.