Woodward v. Lutsch
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered September SO, 1911, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action to restrain the foreclosure of a chattel mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
The plaintiff was indebted to the defendant Herman Lutsch upon three promissory notes; one for $1,000, due June 12, 1911; one for $1,000, due December 12, 1911; and one for $500, due May SI, 1912. These notes were secured by mortgage upon personal property. After the first named note became due and was not paid, the defendant Lutsch proceeded by notice under the statute to sell the mortgaged chattels in satisfaction of all three of the notes. After the sheriff had taken possession of the mortgaged property, the plaintiff brought this action to restrain the sale, alleging that the sum of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reisan v. MottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Thomas v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Bartlett Estate Co. v. Fairhaven Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908
- Mjones v. Yellow Medicine County BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by4 opinions
- Navajo Live Stock & Trading Co. v. Gallup State BankNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
- Allen v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Yellowstone Sheep Co. v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
- Nett v. Stockgrowers' Finance Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1929