Johnson v. M. J. Uline Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1DissentCayton, Associate Judge
In voicing my dissent I do not stress the substantive question involved, though there is ample basis for arguing that the majority opinion is wrong in its reasoning and in its conclusion that the allegations of the complaint do not make out a case of agency. A number of well-considered cases have taken a broader and more realistic approach in’ testing the facts for proof, or lack of proof, of agency. Davis v. Merrill, 133 Va. 69, 112 S.E. 628; New Ellerslie Fishing Club v. Stewart, 123 Ky. 8, 93 S.W. 598, 9 L.R.A..N.S., 475; Richberger v. American Express Co., 73 Miss. 161, 18 So. 922, 31…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Continental Collieries, Inc. v. ShoberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Tahir Erk v. Glenn L. Martin Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Davis v. MerrillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.