Legal Opinion

Cascade Steel Rolling Mills v. Madril

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 13, 1983No. 78-05798, 79-08024; CA A25670PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Employer appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on remand. It contends that the Board erred in not considering the combined effect of claimant’s prior injuries and his past receipt of compensation for those injuries in making its award.

In a prior appeal in this case, we recognized that ORS 656.222 requires that, when a worker has been paid compensation for a permanent disability, his award of compensation for future accidents must be made with regard to the combined effect of his injuries and his past receipt of money for such disabilities.1 Cascade Steel Rolling Mills v.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowman v. Oregon Transfer Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. Green v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills v. MadrilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fischer v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Thomason v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API