Denney v. Wardson Constr., Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DIETZ, Judge.
*16 Defendant Wardson Construction, Inc. appeals a partial summary judgment order rejecting some of Wardson's res judicata defenses. Wardson concedes that this appeal is interlocutory and, notably, does not assert on appeal that the trial court's partial rejection of its res judicata defense creates any actual risk of inconsistent verdicts-meaning a risk that separate fact-finders reach conflicting results on the same factual issues.
Instead, relying on a handful of decade-old cases, Wardson contends that the denial of a res judicata defense is immediately appealable in every case as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Bockweg v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Moody v. Able Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Ballard v. ShelleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- Lee v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ayala v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- Bartels v. Franklin OperationsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2023
- Butterfield v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- Butterfield v. GrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- Capitol City Homes, LLC v. Starlight Homes N.C., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.