Legal Opinion

Morton Bruce Erenstein v. SEC

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 16, 2008No. 07-15736UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Morton Bruce Erenstein, proceeding pro se, petitions for review of a final disciplinary order of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) affirming a decision of the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”), which found that, as a securities dealer or associated person, he had violated two regulatory rules and should be suspended for a period of one year.

Liberally construing his brief, Erenstein argues that his suspension constituted an abuse of discretion as substantial evidence did not support the SEC’s finding that he violated the rules. Because Erenstein also challenges…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Hannah v. LarcheSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. City of Daytona BeachDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2025
  2. Lynch v. HarperDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2022
  3. Nancy's Home of the Stuffed Pizza, Inc. v. FreedmanDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2023
  4. Transamerica Life Insurance Company v. WhiteDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
  5. Yacht Management South Florida, Inc. v. M/V PRIVEEDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API