Fisher v. Rodahl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
This is an action to recover a broker’s commission alleged to have been earned by respondent when he procured a purchaser for appellant’s farm. Respondent had a directed verdict, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, this appeal is taken.
July 17, 1931, appellant and respondent entered into a brokerage contract whereby respondent, for a period of 12 months, ivas given the exclusive right to sell or contract to sell appellant’s farm. Respondent’s compensation, should he be successful in finding a purchaser, was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meyer v. Keating Land & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Martinson v. HenslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Klemik v. Henricksen Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
3Cited by1 opinion
- Nelson v. Rosenblum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970