Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Rodahl

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 7, 1936No. 30,716PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This is an action to recover a broker’s commission alleged to have been earned by respondent when he procured a purchaser for appellant’s farm. Respondent had a directed verdict, and from an order denying appellant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial, this appeal is taken.

July 17, 1931, appellant and respondent entered into a brokerage contract whereby respondent, for a period of 12 months, ivas given the exclusive right to sell or contract to sell appellant’s farm. Respondent’s compensation, should he be successful in finding a purchaser, was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Keating Land & Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Martinson v. HenslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  3. Klemik v. Henricksen Jewelry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nelson v. Rosenblum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API