Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Barnhart
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 9, 2005No. Civ. Action 04-2237 (WHW)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Isaac Pearson seeks review of the final determination of the Commission er of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his claim for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3). This Court will reverse the Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision to deny benefits and remand the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
A. Procedural History
Plaintiff applied for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income payments on March 20, 2002. (Tr. 48-51,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Daniel P. Cotter v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lane-Rauth v. BarnhartDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Banks v. ASTUREDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- BLACKMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Bryant v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- GULTEKINOGLU v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.