Drabicki v. City of Ridgeland
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1DissentRoberts, J.
¶ 22. I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the case before us is error free and can be safely affirmed with confidence. The majority finds that the Circuit Court of Madison County did not err when it affirmed Dra-bicki’s convictions after it allowed the City of Ridgeland to file an untimely appellee’s brief, and after it had already effectively reversed Drabicki’s convictions. Furthermore, the majority finds the County Court of Madison County did not err when it admitted, as self-authenticating, two calibration certificates of the Intoxilyzer 8000 used to test…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. PannellMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Chatman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- People v. SpinelliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1967
- Commonwealth v. PaascheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- People v. KeeneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.