Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Paasche

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1984PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

A judge sitting in the jury-of-six session of the Barnstable District Court has reported this case involving the legality of applying the shellfish regulations of the town of Provincetown to the harvesting of sea or surf clams by the defendants. The basic question is whether the town may lawfully bar nonresidents, such as the defendants, from har vesting sea or surf clams in the ocean waters lying within the town’s boundaries.

The case comes to us on a statement of agreed facts that was filed after the judge reported the case to the Appeals Court. 2 The complaints charge the defendants Paasche…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lockhart v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. County Commissioners v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrumbleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. Colon-CruzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. RaposoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  4. MacWhorter v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. MaloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API