Legal Opinion

Prentice v. Twin City Wholesale Grocery

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 1938No. 31,594PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

By writ of certiorari the relators seek to reverse a decision of the industrial commission awarding compensation to the respondent injured September 11, 1936, while employed by the Twin City Wholesale Grocery. Prentice’s work consisted of loading and unloading boxes of merchandise onto and from boxcars by means of a conveyor consisting of an elevator conveyor Avhich lifted boxes from the basement to the third floor of the Avarehouse and onto a horizontal conveyor 50 or 60 feet long, which in turn connected with four gravity conveyors that led to different aisles. At each of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rautio v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Tucker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Lange v. Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  4. Brown v. Forum Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Auto Lite Battery Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API