Legal Opinion

State v. Shores

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 31, 2002No. COA01-1435PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

Defendant, Stephen Archie Shores, appeals from judgment entered on his conviction of second degree murder. For the reasons herein, we order a new trial.

Defendant contends the trial court erred by (1) admitting evidence of his post-arrest silence and allowing the State to comment on such evidence in closing argument, (2) failing to intervene ex mero motu to correct two grossly improper comments made by the State’s attorney during closing argument, (3) admitting irrelevant and highly prejudicial evidence of defendant’s prior threats against unrelated third parties, (4) admitting…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  5. State v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  2. State v. BostonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. State v. DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API