Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided February 23, 2007No. Criminal No. 2005-76PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGomez, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(February 23, 2007)

Before the Court are the suppression motions of defendants Gelean Mark (“Mark”), Vernon Fagan (“Fagan”), Alan Dinzey (“Dinzey”), Keith Francois (“Francois”), Alexei Emmanuel (“Emmanuel”), Dave Blyden (“Blyden”), Tyrone Alexander Prince (“Prince”), Royd Thompson (“Thompson”) and Leon Boodoo (“Boodoo”) (the “defendants”).1 Each defendant seeks suppression of any communications intercepted by wiretap pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, 18 U.S.C. §§2518 et seq., (“Title III”). In addition, defendant Fagan seeks to suppress…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PhillipSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API