Legal Opinion
Lorber v. Tooley
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1941No. Civ. No. 11626PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiffs in three separate actions sued to recover the balances due on three promissory notes. The actions were consolidated. A separate set of findings was made in each action and a separate judgment was entered. From each judgment the defendant has appealed.
The controversy arose out of the following facts:
Carrie M. Botts, deceased, the maker of the three promissory notes upon which these actions were instituted, was the wife of James M. Botts, who died in March, 1934. By his will James M. Botts appointed R. Stanley Dollar his executor, left nothing to his wife Carrie M. Botts, except…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Estate of McDougaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bixby v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Newcomb v. NewcombAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Marine Paint Co. v. TooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Tooley v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942