Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Roland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 1, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Adams District Court. — Hon. W. H. Tedeord, Judge. The plaintiff filed his petition for the appointment, of a receiver to manage and control certain real estate pending litigation in which the title to' the property is in dispute between the parties. Notice of the application was given to the defendants, and a hearing was had, and a receiver was appointed. From the order making such appointment the defendants- appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtRothrock, J.

I. The property in controversy consists of six and one-half lots in the city of Corning, on which is situated a large and valuable dwelling house, with the usual out-buildings and improvements. The property was once owned by one Beymer, and was sold at sheriff’s sale by Moses Colby, and before the time for the redemption of the premises expired’Colby died, and the defendant John N. Roland was appointed administrator of his estate. A sheriff’s deed was made to Roland. The plaintiff, Mitchell, claims to be the owner of the property by a contract with the heirs of Colby, and the defendants…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shors v. ShorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Garnett v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Gunsch v. GunschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Carr v. Marion Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Co. v. Barre & Montpelier Traction & Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API