Legal Opinion

Garnett v. Oliver

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 28, 1931PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Willis —

On Motion to Reinstate Attachment.

Garnett acquired by assignment from the payee a note executed by Oliver. He sued Oliver in the Clark circuit court, seeking to obtain a judgment for the face of the note, with two minor credits thereon. The circuit court ruled that the plaintiff’s petition was deficient in omitting to allege the exact amount of the consideration paid for the assignment. The plaintiff stood upon his petition and suffered a dismissal thereof for declining to conform to the ruling of the court. An appeal was prosecuted, resulting in a reversal of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Ex Parte LohmullerTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. New Brighton & New Castle Railroad v. Pittsburgh, Youngstown & Chicago RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  4. State ex rel. Boston & Montana Consolidated C. & S. Mining Co. v. Second Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Hart County Deposit Bank v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Hamilton v. Hayes Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1952
  3. Maynard v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1952
  4. Wright v. Ecolab, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Finance and Administration Cabinet v. Hon Thomas D. Wingate Judge, Franklin Circuit CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API