Legal Opinion
Bolsinger v. Marr
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1969No. Civ. 33924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLEMING, J.
Bolsinger appeals the dismissal of his action against the Marrs for want of prosecution. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.) The relevant chronology:
December 1962—Bolsinger filed an action against the Marrs for specific performance, declaratory relief, and damages in connection with a contract for the purchase of real property.
September 1965—The Marrs filed a separate action against Bolsinger to partition the real property involved in Bolsinger’s complaint, property assertedly owned by the Marrs and Bolsinger as tenants in common.
April 1966—On Bolsinger’s motion the two actions were…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Larkin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Tomales Bay Oyster Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Oberkotter v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Wiggins v. Washington Nat. Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Brunzell Construction Co. v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Dounel v. Duel CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Seto v. SzetoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022