Legal Opinion
United States v. Diaz-Arroyo
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 12, 2015No. 14-1929PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
In this sentencing appeal, defendant-appellant Hainze Elias Diaz-Arroyo complains that his 48-month sentence is substantively unreasonable and that a condition of supervised release fails to make clear that he is not prohibited from using the internet. After careful consideration, we affirm the sentence itself but remand for the limited purpose of correcting the judgment to clarify the challenged supervised release condition.
/.
BACKGROUND
As this appeal follows a guilty plea, we draw the facts from the plea agreement, the change-of-plea colloquy, the presen-tence…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Flores-MachicoteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Claude Paul TardiffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Ruiz-HuertasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Dávila-GonzálezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Miranda-DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Ubiles-RosarioCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Diaz-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Lasalle-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Rodriguez-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.