Legal Opinion

James v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 6, 1955No. 35661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, P. J.

The only question for this court to decide is whether or not as a matter of law the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer. The Supreme Court in Krueger v. MacDougald, 148 Ga. 429 (96 S. E. 867) said: “It is an elementary rule of construction as applied to a pleading, that [on demurrer] it is to be construed most strongly against the pleader; and that if an inference unfavorable to the right of a party claiming a right under such a pleading may be fairly drawn from the facts stated therein, such inference will prevail in determining the rights of the parties.” In Butler v. Jones, 85…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Krueger v. MacDougaldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Bivins v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  3. Vaissiere v. J. B. Pound Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Wilkinson v. Rich's Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  5. Daniels v. Intendant & WardensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Youngblood v. Henry C. Beck Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  3. Abercrombie v. Ledbetter-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API