Legal Opinion

Feingold v. Hankin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 9, 2005No. Docket No. 04-4709CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*163SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff-appellant Stanley Feingold (“Feingold”) appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment on his unjust enrichment claim against Westchester Community College (“WCC”), a branch of the State University of New York (“SUNY”) system.1 Feingold claims that WCC promised him “a pension or equivalent” when he accepted a position as Cultural Coordinator at WCC in 1982. But sections 211 and 213 of the New York Retirement and Social Security Law barred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seif v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. Corning v. Village of Laurel HollowNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Connolly v. MccallCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. Housing Works, Inc. v. TurnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Vrooman v. Village of MiddlevilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API