Legal Opinion

MacKenzie v. Caldwell Shipping Co.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 9, 1983No. 82-218-Civ-J-MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MELTON, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on defendants Caldwell Shipping Company and Strachan Shipping Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court has considered the legal memoranda filed by the parties and has heard oral argument on the motion.

Defendants contend that the cause of action was not instituted within the six-month period of section 933(b) of the Longshoreman’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950 (1976). Defendants rely on two decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. These decisions hold that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joseph Duris v. Erato Shipping, Incorporated Japan Line Limited Regent Botan Shipping, Inc. Pallas Shipping Agency, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Ameta & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
  3. Francesco Verderame v. Torm Lines, A/sCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Simmons v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
  5. Kirsch v. Bangladesh Shipping Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API