Roux v. Blodgett & Davis Lumber Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee. (Stone, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 85 Mich 519.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This case was in this Court at the April term, 1891,- and is reported in 85 Mich. 519. On the former trial in the court below the court took the case from the jury on the ground that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The case has again been tried, and the plaintiff recovered judgment in the sum of $6,000. Defendant brings the case to this Court by writ of error. The facts appearing in the present case are substantially as they appeared in the former record, and are so fully stated in the former opinion that a restatement o'f them is unnecessary.
It is claimed by defendant’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ford v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- VanDusen v. LetellierMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Roux v. Blodgett & Davis Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Brezee v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Sadowski v. Michigan Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brownell v. MooreheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Cadden v. American Steel Barge Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Balhoff v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Anderson v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Scendar v. Winona Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.