State v. Hill
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of burglary, Minn. St. 609.58, subd. 2(3), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 5 years in prison. On his appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends (1) that there was as a matter of law insufficient evidence of his guilt, (2) that the prosecutor committed misconduct both at voir dire and in closing argument, (3) that his appearance in jail-issued clothes on the second day of voir dire deprived him of a fair trial, and (4) that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the defense…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- City of St. Paul v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Naugher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984