Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 24, 1977No. 46265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of burglary, Minn. St. 609.58, subd. 2(3), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 5 years in prison. On his appeal from judgment of conviction defendant contends (1) that there was as a matter of law insufficient evidence of his guilt, (2) that the prosecutor committed misconduct both at voir dire and in closing argument, (3) that his appearance in jail-issued clothes on the second day of voir dire deprived him of a fair trial, and (4) that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the defense…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. State v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. City of St. Paul v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WahlbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Naugher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API