Legal Opinion
Rinehart v. Bateman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 21, 2012No. WD 73954PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Judge.
Robert and Donna Bateman (collectively, the “Batemans”) appeal from the judgment of the Clay County Circuit Court reversing the decision of the State Tax Commission (the “STC”) finding that agriculturally classified property (the “Property”) 1 owned by the Batemans met the statutory requirements to be valued at its productive capability rather than at its fair market value.
We find the STC did not err in concluding that the Property, which all parties agree was properly classified as agricultural, met the statutory requirements to be valued at its productive capability…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Albanna v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Lagud v. Kansas City Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Bird v. Missouri Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Professional Land Surveyors & Landscape ArchitectsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Coffer v. Wasson-HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Union Electric Co. v. EstesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Tibbs v. Poplar Bluff Associates I, L.P.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Cathy Rinehart, Assessor Clay County, Missouri v. Laclede Gas CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- David Cox, Platte County Assessor, and Park Hill School District v. Grady Hotel Investments, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission v. Kenneth Zellers, Commissioner of AdministrationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.