Legal Opinion
Lagud v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 22, 2004No. SC 85627PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.
The Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners (the Board) found that Officer Jeffrey Lagud violated department policy by touching the penis of an arrestee while collecting a urine sample and by being untruthful in his testimony before the Board and during the investigation of the incident. As a result, the Board suspended Officer Lagud without pay for nearly eight months. Officer Lagud alleges that the Board should have stricken the testimony of Mr. Russell, the alleged victim, because his invocation of the Fifth Amendment on cross-examination improperly precluded…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Hampton v. Big Boy Steel ErectionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Mitchell v. KardeschSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- Albanna v. State Board of Registration for the Healing ArtsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Black v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Coffer v. Wasson-HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Stone v. Missouri Department of Health & Senior ServicesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.