Huber & Rowland Construction Co. v. City of South Salt Lake
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROCKETT, Justice.
The problem of concern here is the interpretation of a contract under which the plaintiffs undertook a construction project of installing sidewalk, curb and gutter in the city of South Salt Lake. The plaintiffs claim that they are entitled to a higher rate of pay for removal of the old sidewalk than the 75‡ per cubic yard allowed and paid them by the defendant for “structural excavation”; and which the trial court held paid them in full. From that ruling plaintiffs appeal upon the judgment roll only, relying upon the language of the contract.
The contract, which the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ephraim Theatre Company v. HawkUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Continental Bank and Trust Company v. BybeeUtah Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by8 opinions
- Auto Lease Company v. Central Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
- Bullock v. Deseret Dodge Truck Center, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1960
- Wingets, Incorporated v. BittersUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Utah State Building Board v. Walsh Plumbing CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- Matter of Estate of OrrisUtah Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.