Legal Opinion

Winston Brick Manufacturing Co. v. Hodgin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaksee, J.

The pleadings disclose an admitted contract between the defendants and the plaintiff in “that the defendants designated and stipulated a road, a 'way of necessity’ over .tbeir own land, to tbe public highway, the same to be used for the benefit of the plaintiff and described as follows: 'This property will have road platted to Walkertown or paved highway’ ” and. defendants allege that ''they provided a roadway and there is still a road to plaintiff’s property.” Plaintiff’s allegation that the defendant closed this “way of necessity” in August, 1923, is dénied, 'and the allegations of damages…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Appeal of North Beach & Mission RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Wagner v. HannaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Herndon v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. McCracken v. . McCrackenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. Andrews v. LovejoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Winston Brick Manufacturing Co. v. HodginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. White v. . CoghillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Shepherd v. Duke Power Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API