McLean v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the First Circuit Court in favor of the State and county, January Term, 1873. C. W. Heiskell, J. These cases were argued together, at the April Term, 1873, during the month of June, and the cause being of great magnitude, the decision was reserved until the October Special Term.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the First Circuit Court in favor of the State and county, January Term, 1873. C. W. Heiskell, J. These cases were argued together, at the April Term, 1873, during the month of June, and the cause being of great magnitude, the decision was reserved until the October Special Term. T shall maintain that neither a failure to collect, nor to pay over, when collected, the exactions of 1868 and 1869 (imposed by authority of the county commissioners of Shelby county) was a breach of the conditions of McLean’s official bonds; and that therefore the judgments against the…
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This record embraces the proceedings in eight several motions, four in behalf of the State, and four in behalf of the county, against Wm. McLean and his sureties, for balances of State, and county revenue, claimed to be due from said McLean, as tax collector *228of the county, for the period of four years. Four motions were first entered: two in behalf of each, State and' county. These, or some of them, were found to be defective, and four other' motions were entered; but the record shows that the eight motions were all prosecuted. We see no necessity for this, as the four motions last entered…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Lee v. MunroeSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- United States v. Gabriel F. IrvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Perry v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1811
- Broome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.