Legal Opinion

Broome v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1854PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States f r the Northern District of Florida. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wayne

Ambrose Crane was appointed collector of customs for St. Mark’s, in Florida, and signed, with his sureties, Swain and Macon, what was meant by them to be an official bond.. The form of the b.ond is given in the statute. This conforms to it in every particular. ■ 1 Stat. at Large, 705. Crane, the collector, became. a defaulter. This suit was brought to recover' the amount of the defalcation from the administrator of Macon, one of the sureties of Crane. The bond is dated'on the 2d June, 1837. Two indorsements are upon it. One of them was made by the District Attorney of the United States for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Le BaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. United States Ex Rel. Wilhelm v. ChainSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Gaussen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Voris v. State xe rel. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Looney v. BelcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API