Legal Opinion

Desir v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 15, 2018No. 14–16–00976–CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMartha Hill Jamison, Justice

In one issue, appellant Mike Desir challenges the trial court's denial of his motion seeking to quash the indictment against him for tampering with governmental records under section 37.10 of the Penal Code. He asserts that his conviction is barred under the doctrine of in pari materia because the offense for which he was indicted is more specifically described in another statute with a lesser range of punishment, section 548.6035 of the Transportation Code, involving "Fraudulent Emissions Inspections of Motor Vehicle[s]." We conclude that the trial court did not have sufficient information…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MoffCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Neal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Cheney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Burke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Mills v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vanessa Cameron v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API