Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Lum

Winchester County Circuit Court

Decided July 5, 2000No. Case No. (Chancery) 00-13Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge John E. Wetsel, Jr.

This case came before the Court on June 29, 2000, for trial on the issues of who was the owner of certain real property. Lum and Brooks appeared in person with their counsel. Although Henri Rowe filed an answer to fixe Bill of Complaint, he made no subsequent appearance in this case. Evidence was heard and argued.

Upon consideration of the evidence, the Court has decided that H. M. Brooks is the owner of the property in question.

I. Findings of Fact

The following facts are found by the greater weight of the evidence.

The Plaintiff is a man of considerable…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bray v. LandergrenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Chavis v. GibbsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  3. Ransome v. Watson's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. Morison v. American Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909
  5. Vicars v. SaylerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API