Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Eddie Lee Anthony

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2015No. 2013AP000467-CRPublished

1DissentShirleys. Abrahamson, C.J.

¶ 111. (dissenting). I disagree with the majority opinion's resolution of both issues presented in the instant case: I. Did the circuit court violate the defendant's constitutional right to testify? II. Is the violation of a criminal defendant's right to testify to relevant evidence (here, self-defense) subject to harmless error review?

¶ 112. I would hold that the defendant was unconstitutionally deprived of the right to testify on his own behalf. I would further hold that harmless error review does not apply when a criminal defendant is denied the right to testify to relevant evidence. See…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API